1986 Citroen CX vs. 2011 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2011 Toyota Matrix is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Citroen CX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Citroen CX would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Citroen CX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Toyota Matrix (132 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 1986 Citroen CX. (105 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 1986 Citroen CX.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Toyota Matrix (173 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Citroen CX. (159 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 2011 Toyota Matrix will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Citroen CX.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Citroen CX | 2011 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Citroen | Toyota |
Model | CX | Matrix |
Year Released | 1986 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 1800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 132 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 159 Nm | 173 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4366 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1549 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2601 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 50 L |