1986 Citroen CX vs. 2012 Holden Caprice

To start off, 2012 Holden Caprice is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Citroen CX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Citroen CX would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Holden Caprice is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Caprice (344 HP) has 239 more horse power than 1986 Citroen CX. (105 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Caprice should accelerate faster than 1986 Citroen CX.

Because 2012 Holden Caprice is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Holden Caprice. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Citroen CX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Caprice (530 Nm) has 371 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Citroen CX. (159 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Caprice will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Citroen CX. 2012 Holden Caprice has automatic transmission and 1986 Citroen CX has manual transmission. 1986 Citroen CX will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Holden Caprice will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1986 Citroen CX 2012 Holden Caprice
Make Citroen Holden
Model CX Caprice
Year Released 1986 2012
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1995 cc 6000 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 105 HP 344 HP
Torque 159 Nm 530 Nm
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Fuel Consumption Overall 5.2 L/100km 12.3 L/100km