1986 Citroen CX vs. 2012 Nissan Juke
To start off, 2012 Nissan Juke is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Citroen CX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Citroen CX would be higher. At 2,165 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Citroen CX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Nissan Juke (188 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 74 more horse power than 1986 Citroen CX. (114 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Nissan Juke should accelerate faster than 1986 Citroen CX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Citroen CX weights approximately 119 kg more than 2012 Nissan Juke.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Nissan Juke (240 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 62 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Citroen CX. (178 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 2012 Nissan Juke will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Citroen CX.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Citroen CX | 2012 Nissan Juke | |
Make | Citroen | Nissan |
Model | CX | Juke |
Year Released | 1986 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2165 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 188 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 178 Nm | 240 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1440 kg | 1321 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 4125 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1570 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3100 mm | 2530 mm |