1986 Citroen GSA vs. 2000 Ford Puma
To start off, 2000 Ford Puma is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Citroen GSA. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Citroen GSA would be higher. At 1,679 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Ford Puma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Puma (153 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 97 more horse power than 1986 Citroen GSA. (56 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Puma should accelerate faster than 1986 Citroen GSA. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Puma weights approximately 350 kg more than 1986 Citroen GSA. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Citroen GSA | 2000 Ford Puma | |
| Make | Citroen | Ford |
| Model | GSA | Puma |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1127 cc | 1679 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 56 HP | 153 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 925 kg | 1275 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4130 mm | 3990 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1320 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2450 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 43 L | 42 L |
