1986 Citroen GSA vs. 2005 Mazda 3
To start off, 2005 Mazda 3 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Citroen GSA. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Citroen GSA would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mazda 3 (148 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 92 more horse power than 1986 Citroen GSA. (56 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1986 Citroen GSA. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mazda 3 weights approximately 310 kg more than 1986 Citroen GSA. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Citroen GSA | 2005 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Citroen | Mazda |
Model | GSA | 3 |
Year Released | 1986 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1127 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 56 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 925 kg | 1235 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4130 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 43 L | 55 L |