1986 Citroen GSA vs. 2006 Mazda 3
To start off, 2006 Mazda 3 is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Citroen GSA. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Citroen GSA would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 3 (105 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 1986 Citroen GSA. (56 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1986 Citroen GSA. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mazda 3 weights approximately 195 kg more than 1986 Citroen GSA. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Mazda 3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Mazda 3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Citroen GSA, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Citroen GSA | 2006 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Citroen | Mazda |
Model | GSA | 3 |
Year Released | 1986 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1127 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 56 HP | 105 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 925 kg | 1120 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4130 mm | 4710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 43 L | 55 L |