1986 Citroen Visa vs. 1967 Dodge Monaco
To start off, 1986 Citroen Visa is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Dodge Monaco. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Dodge Monaco would be higher. At 6,292 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Dodge Monaco is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Dodge Monaco (270 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 214 more horse power than 1986 Citroen Visa. (56 HP @ 6250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Dodge Monaco should accelerate faster than 1986 Citroen Visa. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Dodge Monaco weights approximately 1064 kg more than 1986 Citroen Visa. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1967 Dodge Monaco is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Dodge Monaco. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Citroen Visa, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 Dodge Monaco (529 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 449 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Citroen Visa. (80 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1967 Dodge Monaco will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Citroen Visa.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Citroen Visa | 1967 Dodge Monaco | |
Make | Citroen | Dodge |
Model | Visa | Monaco |
Year Released | 1986 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1124 cc | 6292 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 56 HP | 270 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 80 Nm | 529 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 9.2:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 800 kg | 1864 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3700 mm | 5590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 3110 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 83 L |