1986 Daihatsu Charmant vs. 2004 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2004 MCC Crossblade is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Daihatsu Charmant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Daihatsu Charmant would be higher. At 1,288 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Daihatsu Charmant is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 MCC Crossblade (70 HP) has 6 more horse power than 1986 Daihatsu Charmant. (64 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 MCC Crossblade should accelerate faster than 1986 Daihatsu Charmant. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Daihatsu Charmant weights approximately 110 kg more than 2004 MCC Crossblade.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 MCC Crossblade (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Daihatsu Charmant. (98 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2004 MCC Crossblade will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Daihatsu Charmant.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Daihatsu Charmant | 2004 MCC Crossblade | |
Make | Daihatsu | MCC |
Model | Charmant | Crossblade |
Year Released | 1986 | 2004 |
Engine Size | 1288 cc | 599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 70 HP |
Torque | 98 Nm | 102 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3210 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 850 kg | 740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 2630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 1810 mm |