1986 Daihatsu Leeza vs. 1955 Hudson Metropolitan
To start off, 1986 Daihatsu Leeza is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Hudson Metropolitan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Hudson Metropolitan would be higher. At 1,200 cc (4 cylinders), 1955 Hudson Metropolitan is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Hudson Metropolitan weights approximately 240 kg more than 1986 Daihatsu Leeza.
Because 1955 Hudson Metropolitan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Hudson Metropolitan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Daihatsu Leeza, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Daihatsu Leeza | 1955 Hudson Metropolitan | |
Make | Daihatsu | Hudson |
Model | Leeza | Metropolitan |
Year Released | 1986 | 1955 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 548 cc | 1200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 41 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 570 kg | 810 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3200 mm | 3800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1400 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2170 mm |