1986 Daihatsu Leeza vs. 1965 Marcos 1800
To start off, 1986 Daihatsu Leeza is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Marcos 1800. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Marcos 1800 would be higher. At 1,778 cc (4 cylinders), 1965 Marcos 1800 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Marcos 1800 weights approximately 200 kg more than 1986 Daihatsu Leeza.
Because 1965 Marcos 1800 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Marcos 1800. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Daihatsu Leeza, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Daihatsu Leeza | 1965 Marcos 1800 | |
| Make | Daihatsu | Marcos |
| Model | Leeza | 1800 |
| Year Released | 1986 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 548 cc | 1778 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 114 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 62 mm | 84.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 60.5 mm | 80 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.1:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 570 kg | 770 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3200 mm | 4080 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1400 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1120 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2280 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 28 L | 27 L |
