1986 Daihatsu Leeza vs. 1974 Lotus Eclat
To start off, 1986 Daihatsu Leeza is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Lotus Eclat. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Lotus Eclat would be higher. At 1,971 cc (4 cylinders), 1974 Lotus Eclat is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1974 Lotus Eclat weights approximately 485 kg more than 1986 Daihatsu Leeza.
Because 1974 Lotus Eclat is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Lotus Eclat. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Daihatsu Leeza, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Daihatsu Leeza | 1974 Lotus Eclat | |
| Make | Daihatsu | Lotus |
| Model | Leeza | Eclat |
| Year Released | 1986 | 1974 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 548 cc | 1971 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 160 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 62 mm | 95.2 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 60.5 mm | 69.3 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.1:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 570 kg | 1055 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3200 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1400 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1200 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2440 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 28 L | 67 L |
