1986 Daihatsu Leeza vs. 2012 Smart ForTwo
To start off, 2012 Smart ForTwo is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Daihatsu Leeza. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Daihatsu Leeza would be higher. At 1,000 cc (3 cylinders), 2012 Smart ForTwo is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2012 Smart ForTwo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Smart ForTwo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Daihatsu Leeza, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2012 Smart ForTwo has automatic transmission and 1986 Daihatsu Leeza has manual transmission. 1986 Daihatsu Leeza will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Smart ForTwo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Daihatsu Leeza | 2012 Smart ForTwo | |
| Make | Daihatsu | Smart |
| Model | Leeza | ForTwo |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 548 cc | 1000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 71 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed automated manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
