1986 Daihatsu Rocky vs. 1983 Volvo 240
To start off, 1986 Daihatsu Rocky is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Volvo 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Volvo 240 would be higher. At 2,765 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Daihatsu Rocky is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Volvo 240 (96 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 1986 Daihatsu Rocky. (72 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Volvo 240 should accelerate faster than 1986 Daihatsu Rocky. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Daihatsu Rocky weights approximately 270 kg more than 1983 Volvo 240.
Because 1986 Daihatsu Rocky is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Volvo 240. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Daihatsu Rocky will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Daihatsu Rocky (171 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Volvo 240. (157 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1986 Daihatsu Rocky will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Volvo 240.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Daihatsu Rocky | 1983 Volvo 240 | |
Make | Daihatsu | Volvo |
Model | Rocky | 240 |
Year Released | 1986 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2765 cc | 1986 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 72 HP | 96 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 171 Nm | 157 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1560 kg | 1290 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4110 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1920 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2660 mm |