1986 De Tomaso Pantera vs. 2000 Renault Clio
To start off, 2000 Renault Clio is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 De Tomaso Pantera. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 De Tomaso Pantera would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 De Tomaso Pantera weights approximately 485 kg more than 2000 Renault Clio.
Because 1986 De Tomaso Pantera is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 De Tomaso Pantera. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 De Tomaso Pantera | 2000 Renault Clio | |
| Make | De Tomaso | Renault |
| Model | Pantera | Clio |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2000 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Horse Power | 350 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1420 kg | 935 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1110 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2770 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 102 L | 50 L |
