1986 Dodge 600 vs. 2002 Ford Puma
To start off, 2002 Ford Puma is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Dodge 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Dodge 600 would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Dodge 600 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford Puma (100 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1986 Dodge 600. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford Puma should accelerate faster than 1986 Dodge 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Dodge 600 weights approximately 130 kg more than 2002 Ford Puma.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Dodge 600 (158 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Ford Puma. (146 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1986 Dodge 600 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Ford Puma.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Dodge 600 | 2002 Ford Puma | |
Make | Dodge | Ford |
Model | 600 | Puma |
Year Released | 1986 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2213 cc | 1560 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque | 158 Nm | 146 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1165 kg | 1035 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4020 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2450 mm |