1986 Dodge Charger vs. 1965 Seat 600
To start off, 1986 Dodge Charger is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Seat 600 would be higher. At 1,592 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Dodge Charger weights approximately 475 kg more than 1965 Seat 600.
Because 1965 Seat 600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Seat 600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Dodge Charger, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Dodge Charger (117 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Seat 600. (47 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1986 Dodge Charger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Seat 600.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Dodge Charger | 1965 Seat 600 | |
| Make | Dodge | Seat |
| Model | Charger | 600 |
| Year Released | 1986 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1592 cc | 767 cc |
| Horse Power | 62 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 117 Nm | 47 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 575 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 3300 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1390 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2010 mm |
