1986 Dodge Charger vs. 1965 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 1986 Dodge Charger is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 1,592 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Dodge Charger (62 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 1965 Suzuki Fronte. (18 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Dodge Charger should accelerate faster than 1965 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Dodge Charger weights approximately 550 kg more than 1965 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1986 Dodge Charger (117 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 85 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Suzuki Fronte. (32 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 1986 Dodge Charger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Dodge Charger | 1965 Suzuki Fronte | |
Make | Dodge | Suzuki |
Model | Charger | Fronte |
Year Released | 1986 | 1965 |
Engine Size | 1592 cc | 360 cc |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 18 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 117 Nm | 32 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 3000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1300 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2060 mm |