1986 Dodge Charger vs. 1976 Opel Ascona
To start off, 1986 Dodge Charger is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Opel Ascona. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Opel Ascona would be higher. At 1,592 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Dodge Charger weights approximately 100 kg more than 1976 Opel Ascona.
Because 1976 Opel Ascona is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Opel Ascona. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Dodge Charger, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Dodge Charger | 1976 Opel Ascona | |
| Make | Dodge | Opel |
| Model | Charger | Ascona |
| Year Released | 1986 | 1976 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1592 cc | 1296 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 62 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 950 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4330 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2530 mm |
