1986 Dodge Charger vs. 1995 Rover 200
To start off, 1995 Rover 200 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Dodge Charger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Dodge Charger would be higher. At 1,994 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Rover 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Rover 200 (197 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 135 more horse power than 1986 Dodge Charger. (62 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Rover 200 should accelerate faster than 1986 Dodge Charger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Rover 200 weights approximately 135 kg more than 1986 Dodge Charger. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1995 Rover 200 (233 Nm @ 2100 RPM) has 116 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Dodge Charger. (117 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1995 Rover 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Dodge Charger.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Dodge Charger | 1995 Rover 200 | |
| Make | Dodge | Rover |
| Model | Charger | 200 |
| Year Released | 1986 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1592 cc | 1994 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 62 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 117 Nm | 233 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 2100 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 1185 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4230 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1410 mm |
