1986 Dodge Charger vs. 1999 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 1999 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Dodge Charger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Dodge Charger would be higher. At 4,554 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1999 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Dodge Charger. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Land Rover Range Rover (407 Nm) has 290 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Dodge Charger. (117 Nm). This means 1999 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Dodge Charger.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Dodge Charger | 1999 Land Rover Range Rover | |
Make | Dodge | Land Rover |
Model | Charger | Range Rover |
Year Released | 1986 | 1999 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1592 cc | 4554 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 117 Nm | 407 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2550 mm |