1986 Dodge Charger vs. 2000 Matra-Simca M72
To start off, 2000 Matra-Simca M72 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Dodge Charger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Dodge Charger would be higher. In terms of performance, 1986 Dodge Charger (62 HP) has 12 more horse power than 2000 Matra-Simca M72. (50 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Dodge Charger should accelerate faster than 2000 Matra-Simca M72.
Because 2000 Matra-Simca M72 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Matra-Simca M72. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Dodge Charger, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Dodge Charger | 2000 Matra-Simca M72 | |
| Make | Dodge | Matra-Simca |
| Model | Charger | M72 |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Horse Power | 62 HP | 50 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
