1986 Dodge Charger vs. 2001 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2001 Ford Ranger is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Dodge Charger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Dodge Charger would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ford Ranger weights approximately 790 kg more than 1986 Dodge Charger.
Because 2001 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Dodge Charger. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Dodge Charger | 2001 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Dodge | Ford |
Model | Charger | Ranger |
Year Released | 1986 | 2001 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1592 cc | 4000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 1840 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 5090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 3010 mm |