1986 Dodge Charger vs. 2001 Lada Samara II
To start off, 2001 Lada Samara II is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Dodge Charger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Dodge Charger would be higher. At 1,592 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Lada Samara II (67 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1986 Dodge Charger. (62 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Lada Samara II should accelerate faster than 1986 Dodge Charger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Dodge Charger weights approximately 80 kg more than 2001 Lada Samara II.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Dodge Charger (117 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Lada Samara II. (110 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 1986 Dodge Charger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Lada Samara II.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Dodge Charger | 2001 Lada Samara II | |
Make | Dodge | Lada |
Model | Charger | Samara II |
Year Released | 1986 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1592 cc | 1497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 67 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 117 Nm | 110 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 970 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2470 mm |