1986 Dodge Charger vs. 2001 Suzuki Covie
To start off, 2001 Suzuki Covie is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Dodge Charger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Dodge Charger would be higher. At 1,592 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Suzuki Covie (70 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1986 Dodge Charger. (62 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Suzuki Covie should accelerate faster than 1986 Dodge Charger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Dodge Charger weights approximately 300 kg more than 2001 Suzuki Covie.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Suzuki Covie (178 Nm) has 61 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Dodge Charger. (117 Nm). This means 2001 Suzuki Covie will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Dodge Charger.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Dodge Charger | 2001 Suzuki Covie | |
Make | Dodge | Suzuki |
Model | Charger | Covie |
Year Released | 1986 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1592 cc | 1327 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | electric |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 70 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 117 Nm | 178 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 750 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 2950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2010 mm |