1986 Dodge Charger vs. 2008 Renault Clio
To start off, 2008 Renault Clio is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Dodge Charger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Dodge Charger would be higher. At 1,592 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Dodge Charger weights approximately 65 kg more than 2008 Renault Clio.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Dodge Charger (117 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Renault Clio. (105 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1986 Dodge Charger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Dodge Charger | 2008 Renault Clio | |
Make | Dodge | Renault |
Model | Charger | Clio |
Year Released | 1986 | 2008 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Size | 1592 cc | 1149 cc |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 117 Nm | 105 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 985 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2480 mm |