1986 Dodge Conquest vs. 2013 Mazda 3
To start off, 2013 Mazda 3 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Dodge Conquest. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Dodge Conquest would be higher. At 2,555 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Dodge Conquest is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Mazda 3 (153 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1986 Dodge Conquest. (143 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1986 Dodge Conquest. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mazda 3 weights approximately 98 kg more than 1986 Dodge Conquest. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Dodge Conquest (251 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 51 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mazda 3. (200 Nm @ 4100 RPM). This means 1986 Dodge Conquest will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mazda 3.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Dodge Conquest | 2013 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Dodge | Mazda |
Model | Conquest | 3 |
Year Released | 1986 | 2013 |
Engine Size | 2555 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 153 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 251 Nm | 200 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4100 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 1378 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4595 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1755 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2640 mm |