1986 Dodge Daytona vs. 1997 MCC Smart
To start off, 1997 MCC Smart is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Dodge Daytona. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Dodge Daytona would be higher. At 2,210 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Dodge Daytona is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Dodge Daytona (96 HP) has 43 more horse power than 1997 MCC Smart. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Dodge Daytona should accelerate faster than 1997 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Dodge Daytona weights approximately 485 kg more than 1997 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1997 MCC Smart is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1997 MCC Smart. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Dodge Daytona, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Dodge Daytona | 1997 MCC Smart | |
Make | Dodge | MCC |
Model | Daytona | Smart |
Year Released | 1986 | 1997 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 2210 cc | 599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 53 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1135 kg | 650 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 2510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1460 mm |