1986 Dodge Lancer vs. 1978 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 1986 Dodge Lancer is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 2,211 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Dodge Lancer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Dodge Lancer (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 1978 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Dodge Lancer should accelerate faster than 1978 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Dodge Lancer weights approximately 108 kg more than 1978 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1978 Mazda Cosmo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Mazda Cosmo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Dodge Lancer, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Dodge Lancer | 1978 Mazda Cosmo | |
Make | Dodge | Mazda |
Model | Lancer | Cosmo |
Year Released | 1986 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2211 cc | 1769 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1092 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2520 mm |