1986 Dodge Lancer vs. 2001 Ford Econovan
To start off, 2001 Ford Econovan is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Dodge Lancer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Dodge Lancer would be higher. At 2,211 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Dodge Lancer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 96 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ford Econovan weights approximately 245 kg more than 1986 Dodge Lancer.
Because 2001 Ford Econovan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Ford Econovan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Dodge Lancer, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Dodge Lancer | 2001 Ford Econovan | |
| Make | Dodge | Ford |
| Model | Lancer | Econovan |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2211 cc | 1996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 96 HP | 96 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1445 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4290 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1640 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2210 mm |
