1986 Dodge Lancer vs. 2002 Mercedes-Benz C
To start off, 2002 Mercedes-Benz C is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Dodge Lancer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Dodge Lancer would be higher. At 2,211 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Dodge Lancer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Mercedes-Benz C (141 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 1986 Dodge Lancer. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Mercedes-Benz C should accelerate faster than 1986 Dodge Lancer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Mercedes-Benz C weights approximately 265 kg more than 1986 Dodge Lancer. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Mercedes-Benz C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Mercedes-Benz C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Dodge Lancer, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Dodge Lancer | 2002 Mercedes-Benz C | |
| Make | Dodge | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | Lancer | C |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2211 cc | 1796 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 96 HP | 141 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1465 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4350 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1730 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2720 mm |
