1986 Dodge Lancer vs. 2004 Jaguar XK
To start off, 2004 Jaguar XK is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Dodge Lancer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Dodge Lancer would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Jaguar XK (390 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 294 more horse power than 1986 Dodge Lancer. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 1986 Dodge Lancer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jaguar XK weights approximately 558 kg more than 1986 Dodge Lancer. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Jaguar XK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Jaguar XK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Dodge Lancer, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Dodge Lancer | 2004 Jaguar XK | |
| Make | Dodge | Jaguar |
| Model | Lancer | XK |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2211 cc | 4196 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 96 HP | 390 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6100 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1758 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4770 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1800 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2590 mm |
