1986 Dodge Lancer vs. 2004 Mercedes-Benz CL
To start off, 2004 Mercedes-Benz CL is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Dodge Lancer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Dodge Lancer would be higher. At 4,966 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Mercedes-Benz CL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mercedes-Benz CL (302 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 206 more horse power than 1986 Dodge Lancer. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mercedes-Benz CL should accelerate faster than 1986 Dodge Lancer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mercedes-Benz CL weights approximately 665 kg more than 1986 Dodge Lancer. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Mercedes-Benz CL is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Mercedes-Benz CL. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Dodge Lancer, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Dodge Lancer | 2004 Mercedes-Benz CL | |
Make | Dodge | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Lancer | CL |
Year Released | 1986 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2211 cc | 4966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 302 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1865 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1860 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2720 mm |