1986 Dodge Lancer vs. 2009 Jeep Cherokee
To start off, 2009 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Dodge Lancer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Dodge Lancer would be higher. At 2,768 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Jeep Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jeep Cherokee (175 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 1986 Dodge Lancer. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1986 Dodge Lancer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 855 kg more than 1986 Dodge Lancer. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Jeep Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Dodge Lancer. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Dodge Lancer | 2009 Jeep Cherokee | |
Make | Dodge | Jeep |
Model | Lancer | Cherokee |
Year Released | 1986 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2211 cc | 2768 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 175 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 2055 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1850 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2700 mm |