1986 Dodge Lancer vs. 2010 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2010 Cadillac CTS is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Dodge Lancer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Dodge Lancer would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Cadillac CTS (270 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 174 more horse power than 1986 Dodge Lancer. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1986 Dodge Lancer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 556 kg more than 1986 Dodge Lancer. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2010 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Dodge Lancer, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Dodge Lancer | 2010 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Dodge | Cadillac |
Model | Lancer | CTS |
Year Released | 1986 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2211 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 270 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1756 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4867 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1842 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2880 mm |