1986 Dodge Lancer vs. 2010 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2010 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Dodge Lancer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Dodge Lancer would be higher. At 2,211 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Dodge Lancer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mitsubishi Colt (148 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 1986 Dodge Lancer. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mitsubishi Colt should accelerate faster than 1986 Dodge Lancer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mitsubishi Colt weights approximately 350 kg more than 1986 Dodge Lancer. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Dodge Lancer | 2010 Mitsubishi Colt | |
| Make | Dodge | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Lancer | Colt |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2211 cc | 1500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 96 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1550 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 3640 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1695 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2500 mm |
