1986 Dodge Lancer vs. 2010 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2010 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Dodge Lancer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Dodge Lancer would be higher. At 2,211 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Dodge Lancer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Volkswagen Polo (104 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1986 Dodge Lancer. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Volkswagen Polo should accelerate faster than 1986 Dodge Lancer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Dodge Lancer weights approximately 112 kg more than 2010 Volkswagen Polo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Dodge Lancer | 2010 Volkswagen Polo | |
| Make | Dodge | Volkswagen |
| Model | Lancer | Polo |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2211 cc | 1200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 96 HP | 104 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1088 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 3970 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1682 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2470 mm |
