1986 Dodge Lancer vs. 2012 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2012 Ford Falcon is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Dodge Lancer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Dodge Lancer would be higher. At 3,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Ford Falcon (265 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 169 more horse power than 1986 Dodge Lancer. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1986 Dodge Lancer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Ford Falcon weights approximately 557 kg more than 1986 Dodge Lancer. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2012 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Dodge Lancer, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Dodge Lancer | 2012 Ford Falcon | |
Make | Dodge | Ford |
Model | Lancer | Falcon |
Year Released | 1986 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2211 cc | 3983 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 265 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | LPG |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1757 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4967 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1868 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2838 mm |