1986 Dodge Shadow vs. 1965 Ford Zodiac
To start off, 1986 Dodge Shadow is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Ford Zodiac. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Ford Zodiac would be higher. At 2,553 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Ford Zodiac is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Ford Zodiac (108 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 1986 Dodge Shadow. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Ford Zodiac should accelerate faster than 1986 Dodge Shadow. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Ford Zodiac weights approximately 94 kg more than 1986 Dodge Shadow. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Ford Zodiac is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Ford Zodiac. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Dodge Shadow, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Dodge Shadow | 1965 Ford Zodiac | |
Make | Dodge | Ford |
Model | Shadow | Zodiac |
Year Released | 1986 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2212 cc | 2553 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1176 kg | 1270 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2780 mm |