1986 Dodge Shadow vs. 1969 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 1986 Dodge Shadow is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 2,212 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Dodge Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Dodge Shadow (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 1969 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Dodge Shadow should accelerate faster than 1969 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Dodge Shadow weights approximately 236 kg more than 1969 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1969 Mazda Cosmo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Mazda Cosmo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Dodge Shadow, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Dodge Shadow | 1969 Mazda Cosmo | |
| Make | Dodge | Mazda |
| Model | Shadow | Cosmo |
| Year Released | 1986 | 1969 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2212 cc | 1962 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 96 HP | 93 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1176 kg | 940 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4150 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1600 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2210 mm |
