1986 Dodge Shadow vs. 2000 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2000 Ford Mustang is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Dodge Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Dodge Shadow would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Mustang (265 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 169 more horse power than 1986 Dodge Shadow. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1986 Dodge Shadow. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Mustang weights approximately 122 kg more than 1986 Dodge Shadow. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Dodge Shadow, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Dodge Shadow | 2000 Ford Mustang | |
| Make | Dodge | Ford |
| Model | Shadow | Mustang |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2212 cc | 4601 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 96 HP | 265 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1176 kg | 1298 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4660 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1860 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2580 mm |
