1986 Dodge Shadow vs. 2002 MCC Smart
To start off, 2002 MCC Smart is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Dodge Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Dodge Shadow would be higher. At 2,212 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Dodge Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Dodge Shadow (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 2002 MCC Smart. (80 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Dodge Shadow should accelerate faster than 2002 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Dodge Shadow weights approximately 360 kg more than 2002 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 MCC Smart is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 MCC Smart. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Dodge Shadow, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Dodge Shadow | 2002 MCC Smart | |
| Make | Dodge | MCC |
| Model | Shadow | Smart |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 2212 cc | 698 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 96 HP | 80 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1176 kg | 816 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 3430 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1620 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2370 mm |
