1986 Dodge Shadow vs. 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK
To start off, 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Dodge Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Dodge Shadow would be higher. At 2,212 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Dodge Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK (167 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 71 more horse power than 1986 Dodge Shadow. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK should accelerate faster than 1986 Dodge Shadow. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK weights approximately 489 kg more than 1986 Dodge Shadow. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Dodge Shadow, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Dodge Shadow | 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK | |
Make | Dodge | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Shadow | CLK |
Year Released | 1986 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2212 cc | 1795 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 167 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1176 kg | 1665 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2720 mm |