1986 Dodge Shadow vs. 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLS
To start off, 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLS is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Dodge Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Dodge Shadow would be higher. At 6,208 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLS (507 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 411 more horse power than 1986 Dodge Shadow. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLS should accelerate faster than 1986 Dodge Shadow. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLS weights approximately 149 kg more than 1986 Dodge Shadow. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Dodge Shadow, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Dodge Shadow | 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLS | |
Make | Dodge | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Shadow | CLS |
Year Released | 1986 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2212 cc | 6208 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 507 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1176 kg | 1325 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1870 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2860 mm |