1986 Dodge Shadow vs. 2013 Dodge CHARGER
To start off, 2013 Dodge CHARGER is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Dodge Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Dodge Shadow would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Dodge CHARGER is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Dodge CHARGER (365 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 269 more horse power than 1986 Dodge Shadow. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Dodge CHARGER should accelerate faster than 1986 Dodge Shadow. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Dodge CHARGER weights approximately 753 kg more than 1986 Dodge Shadow. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Dodge CHARGER is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Dodge CHARGER. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Dodge Shadow, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Dodge Shadow | 2013 Dodge CHARGER | |
Make | Dodge | Dodge |
Model | Shadow | CHARGER |
Year Released | 1986 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2212 cc | 5700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 365 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1176 kg | 1929 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 5077 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1905 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 3052 mm |