1986 Donkervoort S8 vs. 2009 Nissan Pixo
To start off, 2009 Nissan Pixo is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Donkervoort S8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Donkervoort S8 would be higher. At 1,993 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Donkervoort S8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Donkervoort S8 (116 HP) has 48 more horse power than 2009 Nissan Pixo. (68 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Donkervoort S8 should accelerate faster than 2009 Nissan Pixo.
Because 1986 Donkervoort S8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Donkervoort S8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Pixo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Donkervoort S8 | 2009 Nissan Pixo | |
| Make | Donkervoort | Nissan |
| Model | S8 | Pixo |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1993 cc | 996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 116 HP | 68 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 3580 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1110 mm | 1400 mm |
