1986 Donkervoort S8 vs. 2010 Citroen C-Crosser
To start off, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Donkervoort S8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Donkervoort S8 would be higher. At 2,359 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Citroen C-Crosser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser (168 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 1986 Donkervoort S8. (116 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser should accelerate faster than 1986 Donkervoort S8.
Because 2010 Citroen C-Crosser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Donkervoort S8. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser (232 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 66 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Donkervoort S8. (166 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2010 Citroen C-Crosser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Donkervoort S8.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Donkervoort S8 | 2010 Citroen C-Crosser | |
Make | Donkervoort | Citroen |
Model | S8 | C-Crosser |
Year Released | 1986 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1993 cc | 2359 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 116 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 166 Nm | 232 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4100 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |