1986 Fiat Argenta vs. 2010 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2010 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Fiat Argenta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Fiat Argenta would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda CX-9 (273 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 173 more horse power than 1986 Fiat Argenta. (100 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1986 Fiat Argenta.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mazda CX-9 (366 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 235 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Fiat Argenta. (131 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2010 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Fiat Argenta.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Fiat Argenta | 2010 Mazda CX-9 | |
| Make | Fiat | Mazda |
| Model | Argenta | CX-9 |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1583 cc | 3700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 273 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Torque | 131 Nm | 366 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 5075 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1935 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1727 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2875 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 35 L | 76 L |
