1986 Fiat Argenta vs. 2012 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Fiat Argenta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Fiat Argenta would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Chevrolet Camaro (323 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 223 more horse power than 1986 Fiat Argenta. (100 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1986 Fiat Argenta.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Chevrolet Camaro (376 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 245 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Fiat Argenta. (131 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2012 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Fiat Argenta.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Fiat Argenta | 2012 Chevrolet Camaro | |
Make | Fiat | Chevrolet |
Model | Argenta | Camaro |
Year Released | 1986 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1583 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 323 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Torque | 131 Nm | 376 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4836 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1918 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1389 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2852 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 35 L | 72 L |