1986 Fiat Argenta vs. 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Fiat Argenta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Fiat Argenta would be higher. At 6,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee (459 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 359 more horse power than 1986 Fiat Argenta. (100 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1986 Fiat Argenta.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee (630 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 499 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Fiat Argenta. (131 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Fiat Argenta.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Fiat Argenta | 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | Fiat | Jeep |
Model | Argenta | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 1986 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1583 cc | 6400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 459 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 131 Nm | 630 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 103 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 71.5 mm | 94 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4859 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 2156 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1756 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2916 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 35 L | 93 L |