1986 Fiat Croma vs. 1964 Zastava 850 K
To start off, 1986 Fiat Croma is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Zastava 850 K. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Zastava 850 K would be higher. At 1,994 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Fiat Croma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Fiat Croma (120 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 85 more horse power than 1964 Zastava 850 K. (35 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Fiat Croma should accelerate faster than 1964 Zastava 850 K. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Fiat Croma weights approximately 265 kg more than 1964 Zastava 850 K. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Fiat Croma | 1964 Zastava 850 K | |
| Make | Fiat | Zastava |
| Model | Croma | 850 K |
| Year Released | 1986 | 1964 |
| Engine Size | 1994 cc | 848 cc |
| Horse Power | 120 HP | 35 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 855 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 3740 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2010 mm |
